If you shoot at 48fps, then your shutter speed needs to be double the frame rate (so in this case, 1/100). Perhaps you're confusing shutter with aperture. I'm not sure you're understanding this correctly. Plus, HFR makes some people sick (like me). HFR doesn't offer any tangible advantages over the current way of doing things. I can't remember the last movie I saw where I thought, "Wow, this action scene is very blurry because of the frame rate!" 24 fps is perfectly adequate. Any DP worth their salt knows how to work with a camera to make crisp action scenes. Some people here are talking about action scenes, and again, there are no clear advantages. Not for the consumers, and not for the people making movies. With HFR, the advantages aren't so clear. There were clear advantages with HD compared to SD. Bigger screens, a vastly superior picture, etc. The consumers were generally very happy with the advantages of HD. Do you remember the time when that transition occurred? Most of the "we now see more flaws" comments were coming from inside the industry because they realized some of the ways they used to do things needed to be adjusted. The parallel to the SD to HD transition isn't a good one.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |